| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
David Glen UKSB Regular


Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 158

|
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cheers, I'm going to look into it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason Xuereb Gold Plus Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2005 Posts: 2100

|
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is the 64bit Xp version backward compatible with 32 bit applications?
Does anyone know if photoshop is going to have a 64bit release soon? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tived UKSB Newbie

Joined: 07 Nov 2007 Posts: 46

|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jason Xuereb wrote: | Is the 64bit Xp version backward compatible with 32 bit applications?
Does anyone know if photoshop is going to have a 64bit release soon? |
Yes, x64 is backwards compatible - unfortunately! So much for progress!
I doubt that you will see a x64 bit version of Adobe product anytime soon. Apparently there isn't that many features in Photoshop that can take advantage of the wider data path.
You can access more memory in windows xp x64 and Vista x64, and photoshop can use more memory in x64 compared to x32.
I have two machines one (Dual Opteron 285, Dual Core) running xp x64 with 8gb and an Intel Quadcore 2.66 with 4gb running vista Ultimate x64, non of them would run FlexiSign 8.1 :-(, but I have CS3 Design Premium and that is running very nicely.
Hope this hepls
Henrik |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tived UKSB Newbie

Joined: 07 Nov 2007 Posts: 46

|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is my opinion that currently XP x64 is more stable atm and have better driver support compared to Vista x64, but this will all change within the next year.
Henrik |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason Xuereb Gold Plus Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2005 Posts: 2100

|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cheers mate.
Do you use photoshop for larger files? Whats your hard drive setup?
I've read so much on the net lately I'm a little confused to what computer to build next.
Alot of things I've read have said the bottle neck for photoshop etc is the hdd because you can't have enough memory on xp 32bit. But if you can run 64bit and have 8GB of ram then most of my work would remind in memory instead of being written to the hard disk.
I'm also told that having a dedicated hard disk for photoshop scratch disk improves performance also. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
steve day UKSB Newbie

Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 34

|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
just to add to this, i just installed 4 gig of ram onto an XP 32 bit machine and it recognises 4 gig in bios but only shows 3.25 gig in windows it self. It does help with massive graphics, almost the same as using small graphics  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tived UKSB Newbie

Joined: 07 Nov 2007 Posts: 46

|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:10 am Post subject: xp x32 will not install with more then 4gb installed |
|
|
as the above, I have had no luck installing XP x32 on one of my workstations, with 8gb of ram. Though XP x64 and Vista x64 loves it
Henrik
PS: and to have more then 2Gb you need to use the /3Gb switch to access the address space above 2gb
PPS: just to add to what Jason so rightly said, a dedicated hard disk for scratch disk is an improvement, but a raid 0 for scratch disk is twice as good :-) which is why I have 8 disks in my workstation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason Xuereb Gold Plus Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2005 Posts: 2100

|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
tived,
What are you designing  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tived UKSB Newbie

Joined: 07 Nov 2007 Posts: 46

|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Jason,
I do mainly photographic retouching and color management for other photographers, and only recently joined one of my friends in his sign-writing business.
I did prepress back in 2000, but haven't done much since, so I am a bit rustic in that department.
so nothing that exciting.
Henrik |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|